Saved Through Childbearing: Virtues as Children in 1 Tim 2

September 26th, 2005 / 0 Comments

Kenneth L. Waters Sr. attempts to "justify an entire new reading of the phrase saved through child bearning" through his radical interpretation of this notoriously problematic text. His proposal uses the term childbearing as the fulcrum for a complete redefinition of the passage. As even a casual reader of Paul would be troubled by the idea of women ‘earning’ salvation by means of giving birth; one of Waters primary reasons for an alternative reading is to remove the awkward notion forced by the literal reading.

For Waters, the use of childbearing doesn’t concern the literal production of children, but serves as a metaphor for the virtues of "faith, love, holiness, and temperance" (think along the lines of ‘fruit of the Spirit’). Thus, for women, salvation was connected to the demonstration of the qualities, or virtues, that signify transformative workings of faith. The result of which is that, although in this instance the men of the church had been tasked with teaching, salvation is solely attained through Christ and is confirmed through the transformative actions of the women of the church. Thus all women will be saved though the work of the Holy Spirit as evidenced by the expression of these attributes.

To qualify his argument, Waters brings to light themes from Philo, Plato, pre-Gnostic thought and Greek culture; all of which employ allegorical uses of childbearing. Waters also considers whether childbearing was used specifically to reference, and perhaps redefine, worship of Artemis, the Ephesian goddess of fertility. Lastly, he maintains that the majority of 1 Timothy speaks of salvation using intentionally gender neutral language, with this passage being the exception in its gender specific directives. Thus, either the author(s) was doing this to contradict other themes within the letter, or perhaps the author was using this passage to further redefine the roles of gender.

My initial reactions have been somewhat divided with this explanation. On the one hand it still seems like a forced reading – perhaps because his reading is unconventional to 21st century language. However, it also does a much better job of maintaining continuity with the thought of the Pauline school. If nothing else it has given me reason not to automatically throw out this text as the work of a redactor, but rather offers encouragement to consider how working to understand an unusual reading (for us) can help illuminate the function of this passage.

Article: "Saved Through Childbearing: Virtues as Children in 1 Tim 2," JBL 123/4 (2004) 703-735 (.pdf)

Comments (0)

Leave A Response

You may use the <a>, <em>, and <strong> tags. Your email address will not be published.

Related Posts

Next Post »

« Previous Post Plans

Here on earth, the church-community lives in a foreign land. It is a colony of strangers far away from home…

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Discipleship


Hi, my name is Scott and I design websites. You can see some of them by visiting my portfolio. When I have the time (which is seldom these days) I like to blog about Christianity, especially theology/ethics. If you want to know more you can read my about page or follow me on Twitter.


You're visiting


Photo: Cross at Goodson Chapel, by Scott
Except where otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 License.


This site validates as XHTML 1.0 Strict
and uses CSS to meet the minimum amount of flair,
does its best to make itself accessible,
respects your privacy,
and is juvenated by WordPress.
This site was created on an energy efficient computer.



Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0


Feed currently unavailable
Flickr Photogallery